|
Question
Of The Week: Why Do Claims Of Eucharistic Miracles Go Uninvestigated

Written by Michael
H. Brown
November 3,
2003 - Reported in Spirit
Daily.com online newspaper. It seems mysterious, why there are
so many reports of Eucharistic miracles and yet so few of them --
virtually none -- made public. There's hardly a region of the U.S.
where one has not occurred in the last 15 years, but also not one
that has achieved formal ecclesiastic recognition. One example:
a Michigan priest named Father Mark A. McQuesten claimed that over
the course of a week a Host turned to actual flesh -- as in the
famous miracle at Lanciano,
Italy. There are other cases of bleeding Hosts or Hosts with
miraculous images in Connecticut, Arizona, New Jersey, Texas, New
York, and other states.
Through history,
there have been dozens of such miracles. To us, most mysterious
is a report that in 1995, a Eucharistic minister opened the tabernacle
at Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church in Methuen, Massachusetts, a
suburb of Boston, and spotted blood on a Host. According to a report,
the Host was then sent to a laboratory for analysis. The mystery:
where is the Host now? What happened to it? If it is true, why is
there so little known about it?
We tried to
track this down, but are informed that the parish is no longer a
functioning one -- eliminated due to lack of priests and attendance,
which sort of adds to the mysterious nature of the alleged phenomenon
in the first place. A bleeding Host in a soon-to-be closed church
in a diocese about to be torn asunder by scandal! "I checked
our diocesan archives, and there was no official investigation of
this by the diocese, nor by the Marist Fathers, who were in charge
of the church at the time," Father Brian Mahoney, director
of the Office for Worship in the Boston archdiocese, informs us.
"It's a church that has been suppressed for no reason other
than the numbers." He further relates that Father Andrew Gosselin,
who was pastor at the time, had heard something "along that
line," that there were "some claims made," but that
the priest knows very little about it, and that the priest who was
most directly involved has since passed on. "There's no official
stand on this," says Father Mahoney in conclusion.
Why there was
not an investigation is baffling, since such occurrences, before
our time, have been rare -- and merited full Church inquiry. Historically,
a bleeding or otherwise miraculous Host has been cause for full-scale
veneration. Is this another example of a Church that has veered
from its mystical roots? Or was it all just a rumor, a bogus miracle,
to start with? Claims one correspondent: "A small sample of
the crusted blood was sent to the California Laboratory of Forensic
Sciences. After several preliminary tests confirmed the presence
of blood on August 30, 1995, a crossover electrophoresis identified
was conducted on the sample which unequivocally identified the reddish
substance as human blood."
We will be investigating
this further. Why would a Host bleed? Another answer may be found
in a reported revelation. "The Sacred Heart of my Divine
Son is being offended grievously, especially in the Holy Eucharist,"
the Blessed Mother allegedly told a victim soul in 19th-century
Europe. In 1879 she reportedly said that the Sacred Heart was especially
wounded by indifference and ungratefulness -- certainly characteristics
of our time.
Such messages
may also be conveyed with a statue of St. Padre Pio that allegedly
has been bleeding in a home in northern California and has been
tested by a laboratory and found to be human blood -- with an effort
underway now to see if it matches the blood of the saint himself,
who left gloves smeared with his stigmatic blood behind.
Back

|